Welcome to CSI's quarterly newlsetter, in which we highlight lessons, projects and recent engagements that we think will enrich your work. 
 
Thank you to all of our clients and colleagues, whose commitment to participatory decision-making and organizational enhancement inspire us to take our methodology to new levels.  We look forward to continued innovation together!
 

     Best Regards,
     Mary Kane, President & CEO

CSI Newsletter January 2008 Issue
In This Issue
Research Innovation Conference
Project Spotlight: The Wilmington HOPE Commission
On the Job: Project Readiness
Recent Presentations and Publications
CSI News and Notes
Concept Systems logo
Research Innovation Conference
 

Thank you to all who participated in and made October's Research Innovation Conference such a positive and rewarding event!  More than 40 of you attended.   It was energizing for us to re-connect with people who are using the methodology in a variety of settings, all focused on improving the condition of our world.  Participants enjoyed networking with colleagues with similar interests.  During the two day event, guest speakers presented innovative applications of the concept mapping methodology, anticipated the future of concept mapping, discussed discipline-specific perspectives on concept mapping and participated in skill-building workshops.  Please visit our post-conference website, where you will find presentation materials, bibliographies and more!

 

We look forward to our on-going collaborations with long-time and new colleagues, who are taking the methodology to exciting places and expanding the possibilities for future researchers and professionals.

Project Spotlight:
 
The Wilmington HOPE Commission Strategic Action Planning Project
 

In February 2007, The Wilmington HOPE Commission asked for our support to develop strategic action plans to realize nine key recommendations identified in the March 2006 Wilmington HOPE Commission Report.  The goal of the Commission was to develop action plans that would result in ". . .solutions to the serious societal issues facing the City." 

In consultation with the HOPE Commission Planning Group, composed of the HOPE Commission Executive Committee and the HOPE Commission Executive Director, CSI designed a three stage process that:

1.  Structured the results of the HOPE Commission Report into a conceptual framework for action

 

2.  Engaged community stakeholders in prioritizing the nine recommendation areas and identified the key tasks and actions that should be taken to make progress in each area

 

3.  Developed action plans to address each of the priority areas

CSI began the process of building the conceptual framework by reviewing and extracting recommendations from the 2007 HOPE Commission Report.  These recommendations were grouped into the nine action areas with a total of 71 specific ideas:

 

ˇ         Expand community policing

ˇ         Improve the education of city children

ˇ         Establish HOPE Zones

ˇ         Improve economic development opportunities

ˇ         Establish HOPE Outreach Workers

ˇ         Coordinate efforts of the faith-based community

ˇ         Strengthen ex-offender re-entry programs     

ˇ         Embark on a Campaign of HOPE

ˇ         Create a permanent HOPE Commission

 

Once the conceptual framework was drafted, CSI and the Planning Group designed two one day workshops to identify and develop strategic actions that would advance the recommendations. 

The first workshop was designed to present the conceptual framework and engage community stakeholders in prioritizing the nine action areas by rating the 71 specific ideas within each area along two dimensions:

 

1.  Importance to accomplish noticeable progress

2.  Feasibility to accomplish noticeable progress within the next 5 years

As a result of the rating exercise in this first workshop, the areas were prioritized for action as follows:

 

1.     Create a permanent HOPE Commission

2.     Embark on a Campaign of HOPE for Wilmington

3.     Establish HOPE Zones

4.     Expand community policing

5.     Create a youth education advocacy organization

6.     Strengthen ex-offender re-entry programs

7.     Improve economic development opportunities for businesses

8.     Establish a network of HOPE Outreach Workers

9.     Coordinate the efforts of the faith-based community

 

Once the areas of priority action were determined, the Planning Group identified community partners whose collaboration and participation would be vital to accomplishing the specific actions within each priority area.  Over one hundred (100) potential partners were identified and a database of the partners, by idea statement in each priority area, was prepared by CSI for presentation at Meeting 2.

The goal for Action Planning Meeting 2 was to target and identify short, mid, and long-term goals in the priority areas, and the development of specific action plans and potential partners for making progress on the goals.  Participants prepared for developing action strategies by first articulating their individual thinking on the political and philosophical importance of making progress in each action area.  They were then tasked to develop tactical approaches for achieving the priorities.  Tactical approaches had to describe "who" (stakeholders and partners), "what" (measurable action steps), "when" (short, mid, or long time frame), and "why" (the expected outcome).

Having arrived at consensus on the practical, philosophical, and political priorities for strategic action, and having tactical approaches for achieving the priorities in hand, the Commission was asked to develop "elevator speeches," public service announcements, press releases, and/or short presentations that would educate stakeholders about the mission of the Commission. 

As a result of the action planning workshops, the HOPE Commission developed a comprehensive strategic plan that engages a diverse community of stakeholders to solve the serious issues facing the city of Wilmington, Delaware.

To learn more about the work of the Wilmington HOPE Commission, please visit their website.
 
CSI's Project Spotlight describes work that the CSI consulting team is engaged in, featuring unique applications of the concept mapping methodology and new uses of project results. 
On The Job:
 
Project Readiness:  Building a Foundation for Success
 

"Well begun is half done." Aristotle's wisdom is as true today as it was over two thousand years ago. How many times have you heard someone say, "I wish I'd thought of that sooner."?  Attending to the right questions early in a project - even before it begins - will help avoid missteps that can set a project back, add costs and jeopardize relationships.  Among the things to consider to help ensure that your project design responds to the context, anticipates hurdles, and sets you up to have the desired effect: 

Needs
- What's the need for the project? How do you know?  Who or what is the catalyst?  What data exist to support the assessment of need?   Different stakeholders may perceive the need or issue differently or may be compelled by different aspects of the same problem.  For instance, building a bicycle trail in a community may address multiple needs (recreation, public health through physical exercise, alternatives to car commuting, economic development) but different stakeholders will resonate to different needs. 
 
Outcomes
- What is the desired outcome?  Who stands to gain from the project? Who might lose? For instance, offering free spays and neuters through a local SPCA might lead to the desirable outcome of reducing unwanted animals, but how will local veterinarians who earn a living from such services respond?
 
Partners
- Who will engage in this effort with you?  What will you ask them to be responsible for? What will they risk and how might they benefit?  Who has authority, position, budget or access to key constituents or communities?  Who will own the project?
 
Structure
- What is the project's structure? Who reports to whom? Many projects involve partnerships in which reporting lines are complex or simply don't exist.  Others are embedded in multi-level systems where there is a need to clarify whether this is a local, decentralized effort or a system-wide coordinated effort, and the implications of that decision for budgets, resources, decision-making authority, control and ownership of data and results. 
 
Communication
- What existing channels can be tapped - formally and informally? Some of the most innovative projects are those that tap effective, informal communication channels.   Think of public health messages delivered through beauty salons where women are already talking about health matters.
 
Evaluation
- How will the effort be evaluated?  How can you build in data collection processes from the beginning?  Too often evaluation is left to the end.  Thinking about it early in a project helps clarify the desired outcomes and helps ensure that you'll be able to document the program at critical points.  
 
Sustainability
- How will the project be sustained?  The rain garden on the school grounds is a great way to protect the nearby creek from parking lot runoff, but who will protect it from well-meaning gardeners and  trampling feet?  The enthusiasm and energy that accompanies initial implementation is hard to sustain.  How can the capacity and ownership be built early in the project that will ensure that seeds sown will continue to be nurtured?
 
Whether you are a project sponsor, partner, consultant or researcher, these project readiness questions can become part of your toolkit to help you build a solid foundation for success -- before the project plan is finalized, before the project is launched and long before anyone can utter, "I wish I'd thought of that sooner."

CSI's On The Job column offers suggestions and insights to help our friends and clients expand their professional toolkits.
Recent Conferences and Presentations
 
American Evaluation Association: Evaluation 2007: Evaluation and Learning
 
Mary Kane, William Trochim and Kathleen M. Quinlan (CSI staff) presented a full day workshop, "Concept Mapping for Evaluation: A Mixed Methods, Participatory Approach" (.pdf) at the American Evaluation Association's annual conference, Evaluation 2007: Evaluation and Learning in Baltimore, MD on November 7, 2007.
 
At the conference, the staff from CSI also presented, with Dr. Jonathan M. Kagan, Deputy Director for Program Development at the Division of AIDS, NIAD, "A Framework for Evaluating Large Scale Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) Clinical Research Networks" (.pdf) which is based on work with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Division of AIDS.
 
For more information about AEA and the conference, please visit the AEA website.
 
Society for Public Health Educators
 
Mary Kane presented a 1 hour interactive presentation entitled "Complementary Action Partnerships for Achieving Health Equity" (.ppt) at the Society for Public Health
Educators (SOPHE)
conference in Alexandria, VA, on November 2, 2007.

For more information about SOPHE and the conference, please visit: www.sophe.org
 
 
 
Recent Publications
 
Carrie J. Petrucci and Kathleen M. Quinlan's article, "Bridging the Research-Practice Gap: Concept Mapping as a Mixed Methods Strategy in Practice-Based Research and Evaluation" has just been published in the Journal of Social Service Research (Vol. 34(2) 2007 pp.25-42).  The article aims to familiarize social work researchers and practitioners with concept mapping as a useful tool in practice-based research.  You can also find the article online at The Haworth Press website
 
A newly published article by JaMuir M. Robinson and William Trochim uses concept mapping to better understand perceived barriers to racial and ethnic minority participation in medical research.  The article, An Examination of Community Members', Researchers' and Health Professionals' Perceptions of Barriers to Minority Participation in Medical Research: An Application of Concept Mapping was published in the November 2007 (Vol. 12, No. 5, pp.521-539) issue of Ethnicity and Health.  To learn more about this journal, visit Routledge, Taylor and Francis group's sign-up area
 
CSI News and Notes 
 
 
Training provides users of The Concept SystemŽ with all the tools and support they need to apply The Concept SystemŽ effectively throughout their organizations for planning, development, decision-making, evaluation and more. 
 
Upcoming sessions of the CS Facilitator Training for Core and Global Applications will be held at our Ithaca, New York offices on the follow dates:
 
January 9 - 11, 2008
   April 16 - 18, 2008
    July 16 - 18, 2008
 
For additional information or to sign up for an upcoming training, please contact Diana Crawford at dcrawford@conceptsystems.com.
 
CSRA Teleseminar
 
A recent Concept Systems Research Association teleseminar, entitled "From Concept Map to Logic Model" was conducted by Senior Consultant and Director of Research, Dr. Kathleen M. Quinlan on December 12, 2007.  The teleseminar covered how to use concept maps as the foundation for logic models, examining the role of the focus prompt, ratings and interpretation of map regions in the construction of logic models and related theoretical models.  Teleseminars are open to all CSRA members.
 
To learn more about how you can become a CSRA member, please visit our CSRA page or contact Diana Crawford at dcrawford@conceptsystems.com.
 
New Staff
 
Concept Systems would like to announce the recent and upcoming arrivals of two new staff members. 
 
*******
Lisa Schappert, MNM joined Concept Systems in October of 2007.  Prior to joining the CSI team, Ms. Schappert worked in both for-profit and not-for-profit organizations. She has several years of administrative and research experience working in finance, healthcare and mental health agencies. She received her Master's degree in Nonprofit Management from Regis University in Denver, Colorado. 
 
She provides support to our Client Services staff as well as to the Sales Unit and general operations of the office.  To learn more about Lisa, please visit our staff webpage.  We are delighted at her arrival! 
 
*******

We are also very pleased to announce that Scott Rosas, Ph.D. will be joining Concept Systems in mid-January 2008 as a Senior Consultant.  Dr. Rosas brings a wealth of experience in concept mapping to his new role.  He has used concept mapping in several child and family services projects, including applications focused on needs assessment, strategic planning, and program theory development.  Most recently, he has focused on concept mapping as a resource for scale development in evaluation.  

 

Scott received his PhD in Family Studies from the University of Delaware in 2002 where he focused on theory-driven evaluation of family support programming.  Since that time, he has worked in different capacities, including as Senior Scientist at Nemours' Center for Children's Health Innovation.  He has also served as an Associate Faculty member in the Department of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health at the Bloomberg School of Public Health, John Hopkins University.  He has been a member of American Evaluation Association since 2000 and serves as a member of the AEA's standing committee on ethics.   

Contact Information
1.800.260.1602

 
 

Browse our past newsletters:
Sept 2007
March/April 2006
Sept/Oct 2005
Jul/Aug 2004
Apr/May 2004
Jan/Feb 2004
May/June 2003